References and Information

Response from the writing forum:

"How much time did you spend writing your book? (Not to mention formatting the content?) Too bad my father isn’t alive ... he was a Biblical scholar in his spare time and would have enjoyed reading it."
Durant Imboden -- Writing forum manager MSN.

"Downloaded your book brief. Excellent, excellent, work. Should get it on the stands. Compared to most of what’s out there this is an outstanding work of research and original thought."
Gary Weishaupt -- MSN member Napa, Ca.

Response from web site synopsis: after going online in April of 1998

"Bravo on your hard work on (Zodiac of Denderah) in identifying the symbol for the axis of the Temple! Also your assertion of the Age of Capricorn being the beginning of the Great 25,000+ Year Cycle and the Age of Aquarius being the end was fascinatingly backed up by the Egyptian carvings of the Square Zodiac."
James M. Rogers -- Cartersville, Ga., June 10, 1998

   "I love this site, its full of the most interesting information. This is a must-see!!!"
   http://www.casscorner.com/reciprocallinks.html, or
   http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/1368/spiritlink/spiritlink.html,
   Cassandra Doyle, July 24, 1998, "http://www.casscorner.com/"

"I have been searching for months to try to find any information on Ancient Hebraic/Judaic (Sumerian?) Astronomy. When I came upon your website I couldn’t believe my eyes. I really didn’t think I would find any references to this subject."
Anonymous – aol.com, August 20, 1998

"I really enjoyed visiting your webpages. They are very unusual, and informative."
Anonymous – Japan, November 05, 1998

"I am SO impressed by your scholarship and web site, I have ordered both the manuscript and on-line access. This is one of the most incredible pieces of research I have ever seen on this subject. This is a must for people to know."
Anonymous -- California, November 20, 1998

22,000 persons viewed this site by the end of 1998.

"I am forever grateful to the information which I have gathered from your research and I think you are one of the most insightful authors of our time and I wish more people thought like you. THANK YOU sincerely, a true believer. "
Jason Bateman, Medway, MA, March 24, 1999

   "I read through your introduction this morning and found myself associating with much of what you said.    I've been a Christian for over 25 years.    In the last few years I have come across many facts that seem to be completely ignored by the modern day 'Church.'    Most of these I have discovered through research in archaeology, geology, astronomy, and various other sciences.
    Your website is the first one I've seen that looks at some of these findings and relates them to the scripture.    Bravo!"
   Anonymous -- Seattle, Washington, June 4, 1999

"With great interest have I been following your webpage. There are many points of interest that your research raises with regard to the great sojourns from Numidia to Iberica around 1,500 B.C. There is ample evidence of predictable maritime explorations of this great land."
Bruce L. Raphael -- research editor for the Worldtree Chronicles, Melbourne, Australia, June 7, 1999, see "http://www.geocities.com/worldtree_2000"

"Jim, from what little I've seen on your site, I'm flabberghasted, in awe, impressed, seen nothing like it, you seem to carry the word of authority!!! I can't wait to read it all. Your web site has accomplished a monumental task of integrating the Bible, history, language and astrology. And making a unified theory is the most difficult."
Robert Teeter -- Boynton Beach, Florida, June 14, 1999

"I find the information very informative and absolutely fascinating. I would really treasure a copy of your book for my own reading and learning endeavors."
Denise Dunham -- North Carolina, September 16, 1999

   "A word about your URL.    Azazel is not the evil spirit on who the sins of Israel were laid upon.    Azazel is the Archangel of Death - you know that Black Angel with the Scythe in his hands who comes to reap the Souls of earth and takes them into the Underworld with him?    I have had some contacts with Supernatural beings from the spiritual realms, and I have seen Azazel - he is a very powerful Archangel in God's service.
   You know I don't understand - just what is the purpose of your URL?    Christians are supposed to refrain from the Occult, but your URL gives information about it.    What are you trying to teach people?"
    Anonymous -- Melbourne, Australia, September 24, 1999 - proclaimed Satanist and member of the Draconian Church found at "http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Bistro/1368/churchmain.html"

"Studied your pages on http://www.mazzaroth.com/. It is very interesting."
Anonymous -- Dubna, Russia, September 30, 1999

"You know the study of the meaning of the position of stars is called astrology and it is a sin against God."
Anonymous -- aol.com, November 11, 1999

"I have visited your site and read about you. May God bless you in your great work doing for our Creator and make mankind to be revealed to the unknown facts."
Anonymous -- Caracalla, Romania, November 16, 1999

"I really appreciate your theories on the astrological significance of the bible, it is a very very very interesting subject ... I have even bookmarked your Alpha and Omega page. I believe you have a lot of insight and I commend you for putting your work on the web for all to seek out and find if they wish to."
Anonymous -- Colorado, November 23, 1999

   "Dear Jim, after browsing your web page and the contents of your research, it has opened up the Bible in a whole new light."
   "Again, many many thanks....this work 'makes sense.' I know that may seem trite, but in a world that doesn't always 'make sense,' especially in these last days it is refreshing to find a work that brings the Word into focus.....it's like saying 'Aha....that's what was going on."
   Janice Link -- Bloomfield, New Mexico, November 27, 1999

"I spent a great deal of time on your site, you have done your research and put in a substantial amount of time developing a great resource. While I am an extreme novice in this field of study, some unusual and hard to explain consequences lead me to your site, especially when I realized that you have found a synthesis with the ice ages/wurm/interglacials and the mazzaroth. "
John Cotter -- aol.com, December 7, 1999

75,187 persons viewed this site in 1999.

The following image is the location of the clients or their Internet Service Provider during the year 1999 A.D. who accessed this site. I find it interesting to see the influence on the world from the Internet. May God Bless all those who viewed the site www.mazzaroth.com and received a message of good news from it.
World Access to mazzaroth.com in the year 1999

World Access to mazzaroth.com in the year 1999

"First of all I would like to say what a wonderful site, I cant wait to tell everyone I know."
Anonymous -- earthlink.net, Tennessee, Februrary 18, 2000

"Dear Mr. Cornwell: I have been visiting your website with much interest, and religous history is a serious hobby, wherefore, I find articles such as yours very edifying."
John Shugart -- ashugart@sginet.com, March 10, 2000

   " Dear Mr. Cornwell:
    Before I became a born-again Christian, I was raised in Astrology.    I came to the understanding of the counterfeit that it truly is.    But counterfeits only exist where something real exists.    Later I became aware that God Himself had revealed his gospel in the heavenlies, as well as depicted the story of the battle between spiritual wickedness and the Creator and His creation, and the coming completeness and perfection in Him.
    Many times we believers will read the Bible and skip over things that we do not understand, even clear arche-types that are mentioned repeatedly and from cover to cover.    Are we going to take a scissors and cut out sections we don't accept or understand?    Or should we diligently study and ask for revelation of what is truly there?
    You have unraveled many of these mysteries, and put them within a structured framework of understanding them, the Mazzaroth, which seems to be very plausible.    I plan to spend much more time on your writings to study the timelines you advance, but nevertheless, this work should be embraced by believers as an incredible and invaluable source to aid them in the study of the Bible.
    The Lord had set me on a course of studying the Scorpion (and the wicked, foolish shepherds who scatter the sheep) vs. the Good & True Shepherd.
    Your website aided in shedding incredible light on this topic, plus spawned other tributary studies.
    Thank you for the time you spent making this information available!    It is truly amazing!"
   Cherie Koch -- Tempe, Arizona, May 1, 2000

121,802 persons viewed this site in the year 2000.

   "Personally I'm bored with hearing of "The Great Egyptians" and all of the more of the same information being released to the public.    Egypt is a link in a chain and Shumer is the oldest link found so far.    I find it odd that so little is really known about Shumer considering how old it is and how long ago the civilization was discovered--maybe it's because it makes the Egyptians seem not-so-great.    I will be checking your site since you seem to be doing real research as opposed to the odd-hock stuff thats on the web.
    Maybe one day someone will be able to go back to Iraq and do some digging.     Good luck."
   Michael Devonish -- mdevonish@hotmail.com, April 9, 2001

"Your site is amazing. Not only do you have an interesting theory on the alignments of the constellations to the time-structure, you are a historian. You must have the patience of Job to be able to research and document all the findings that you put forth."
David Brown, Fletcher, NC, October 26, 2001

   "Yes, I am very impressed by what you've discovered.    More, your index shows a depth of honesty in your research that goes beyond anything I have ever seen from a Christian.    It's quite refreshing and I hope you reach a wider Christian audience for the sake of Christians.    Most today have fallen into a world of superstition and blind faith that is bringing a total discredit to the religion.    This danger has given rise to fundamentalism in this country...really no different from what's going on in the Muslim and Jewish worlds.    These Christian fundies simply bomb doctors and abortion clinics instead of embassies and twin towers.    So your work seems important to me.
    You've created a tremendous resource.    And I see myself consulting your work for a long time to come.    But utterly fantastic read and worth every penny I spent.     I can't wait to see Volume III!"
   Paul Joseph Rovelli, Newark, NJ U.S.A., zephyros@a-m-h-r.org, December 12, 2001

175,849 persons viewed this site in the year 2001.

The entire work was updated on November 27, 1998 Volume I and Volume II for a finished work.
Hebrew transliteration compared to the KJV translation can be ordered separately at present.
Volume III subjects will be on the web site www.mazzaroth.com/ as to any thing new discovered to date.

227,274 persons viewed this site in the year 2002.

273,275 persons viewed this site in the year 2003.

Volume III is now complete and released for those who purchased Online Access for The Alpha and the Omega - Volume I, Volume II, and Volume III. It can be found at the following link Volume III Online Access - Denderah Zodiac, Grand Temple, Esneh Connections

283,279 persons viewed this site in the year 2004.

"Dear Jim, I visited your website and read a little of the enormous amount of rich and deep information gathered there. I have bookmarked it for perusal later."
Anonymous -- Melbourne, Australia, November 19, 2004

"Hi Jim, I was reading your kool website on the Mazzaroth. I am interested in this and doing some personal research. Thanks."
Anonymous -- Albuquerque, New Mexico, December 21, 2004

348,158 persons viewed this site in the year 2005.

"Very interesting research!"
Anonymous -- Santa Clara, California, February 10, 2005

"I recently encountered your on line book Alpha and Omega and wanted to thank you for an exceptionally well thought out presentation."
Anonymous -- Rockford, IL., May 6, 2005

"Hi... my name is Lucy and I came across your web site which I found very interesting especially when talking about the earth's age."
Anonymous -- Canada, May 13, 2005

"I have read many papers, talked with many ministers and lay people, and have come to the conclusion most do not know how to do research, or if they do, it is incomplete, lacks good resources, and presents claims that are simply not true. This is not true of your work. I have been accessing your website since 1996. It is one of the first sites I came across when I used it for the first time. We fail in our research because we fail in thinking how God has thought about the matter. I see your work as a resource in example of the excellence we should all be seeking to attain. Not necessarily by content, but craft, though this topic has been of keen interest to me for a very long time. You own this work; it is your passion; It is a drive. Bless you for that zeal."
Anonymous -- Ladonia, Texas, October 11, 2005

The Alpha and the Omega - Volume I, Volume II, and Volume III was released on November 1, 2005 as CD-ROM Version 1.0 and has been upgraded to version 2.0 as of April 15, 2006. It can now be ordered at Book Order Form.

"Thank you for enlightening and inspiring us with your presence / presents. I was led to your gem-of-a-website a few years ago and resonated to the 'frequency of your intentions'."
Anonymous -- Hawaii, January 9, 2006

"Dear Mr. Cornwell, First of all, I thank you so very much for all your incredible knowledge and most exciting and informative and wildest Website I have ever visited!! I have been to thousands of sites looking for more insight into our last days of wickedness on this Earth. Your vast knowledge has helped me see things even better Jim! I had to thank you Jim, someone Divine is helping you to help many, and I thank you with my whole heart for your vast knowledge!"
Anonymous -- Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, February 2, 2006

"Where do you get all this information.. it is amazing... Regards."
Anonymous -- Bogata, Columbia, South America, April 27, 2006

"Hello Jim: I received your CD on Monday. Thank you very much for your speedy delivery. Jim, you are surely a gifted individual with profound insights within your book. Keep the pedal to the metal! I am enjoying your book tremendously but can only digest limited information because of its deep content. I love this stuff. Take care and God bless you through Jesus Christ. Our Lord!"
Anonymous -- California, May 3, 2006

"I came across your site today, and I am astonished at the amount of information contained therein, I am taking my time to read the chapters available online. Being a student of the scriptures I am delighted and fortunate to have come across this site. I will write again soon, and just want to thank you for making such information available. May He continue to open the eyes of your understanding. Amen."
Anonymous -- June 15, 2006

432,929 persons viewed this site in the year 2006.

The Alpha and the Omega - Volume I, Volume II, and Volume III CD-ROM Version 2.0 has been upgraded to version 3.0 as of October 31, 2007. It can now be ordered at Book Order Form.

    "Mr. Cornwell,
    I did receive the CD-ROM and look forward to absorbing the valuable information it contains."
    Joe Johnson, Missouri -- January 20, 2007

    "Dear Mr. Jim A. Cornwell
    Please let me introduce myself, I am the director of the Givatayim Observatory in Israel and the chairman of the Israeli Astronomical Association.
    I am about to publish a book about the 88 constellations, in Hebrew encyclopedia format spanning about 900 pages.    It will cover the lore and legends of the stars and constellations as well as description of the deep sky objects in each constellation.    There are some articles referring to the ancient Egyptian signs.    I have seen many drawings of the Dendera zodiacs, but I find your Web-site as one of the most professional sites dealing in this item.
    I would be pleased to have your permission to use some of your Dendera images or drawings, under a credit, in my book."
    Igal Pat-El, Ramat-Gan, Israel -- February 27, 2007

    "Hello,
    I came to your site really by accident but found it very interesting/Fascinating reading (albeit a tad above my head!).    I initially contacted an Egyptologist (in Egypt) because when I was 10 years old I saw a photo of an Egyptian wall painting of the zodiac signs and the 'pisces' symbol looked very much like 'dolphins' swimming in opposite direction and so after all these years I have finally been able to query this.    I kindly received a reply saying that it would have been the 'denderah' which if found in the nile does resemble a dolphin?    So I typed in this word hoping I'd see a photo of this Denderah fish/mammal?    But I spotted your site and got totally sidetracked!!!!
    Best wishes ... I'll keep reading .... I'm only a mere beginner!!!"
    Michele Cowell -- March 27, 2007
[I sent her a file on the Egyptian HatMehit]

    "From: professor Gideon Olanrewaju
Dear Jim,
    I was introduced to your site by a friend and after going through it I feel strongly attached to the truth you give because these are the truths that I've been searching for.
    Please what I found on your site are not enough for me, could you please teach me more because i believe in these truth.
    Than you sir, Your student, Gideon."
    Gideon Olanrewaju, President of ACTSeminary & Graduate Schools, Nigeria -- November 21, 2007

    "Subject: WTO To: mazzaroth@live.com
    Hello Mr. Cornwell,
    I came accross your site and would like to know if I may get more information about the 10 regions of the free trade.    Interesting, I also recently have been connecting the WTO to the 10 toes in book of Daniel.    I am looking for an updated list and more information about them.    If you could send me something or tell me where I can get more, that would be great and greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,"
    Scott Mason -- November 21, 2007
-------
    Response: Jim Cornwell wrote:
    Dear Scott Mason
    At my site www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterSeven/?, I present much information about the 10 regions and news articles on its development.    Most of this is free online.    Volume II - Chapter Seven section A, covers most of this subject, but my Volume III released in 2002, which is a purchase only can be seen at www.mazzaroth.com/BookOrder.htm, continues the subjects of the WTO, G7, etc.
    www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterSeven/NewWorldOrder.htm, 1994 Jan-Oct., "THE NEW WORLD ORDER: (G7) Great Seven: the richest industrial nations of the world"
    www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterSeven/TheGreatSeal.htm, which covers what the Great Seal means and where it came from: a recap of world news events regarding the evolution of New World Order.
    www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterSeven/TheGreatSeven.htm shows the Council of Ministers, the EU and the Great Seven and what happened in 1995.
    www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterSeven/GATT-WTO.htm GATT to WTO Rev. 13:1, which continues to a link which requires a username and password for access to "Volume III - World Trade Organization Beyond 2000" http://www.mazzaroth.com/VolumeIII/V3WTO2000.htm
    www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterSeven/TenRegionsWTO.htm, which covers The 10 Regions of Free Trade under GATT - The New One World Trade Organization.    www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterSeven/RecentNewsWTO.htm Recent News Articles about the World Trade Organization.
    Volume III New Released Files on the Table of Contents includes extensive articles on your subject from 2000 to date.    All of this is on CD-ROM if you are interested and is too massive to send to you in an email.    I hope I have answered your quest.
    Jim Cornwell.

    "Hi Jim, thank you so much for replying ..I've been hoping to find someone with the gift of prophecy who has the Fathers WORD enshrined in their heart ... and from the Mountain of work you've done your love for truth is obvious.
    There really wasn't any One thing on your site that drew my attention ... all of it did ... as the WORD unveiled a few things regarding these END times we live in simply from the information on your site ..."
    David Hooper, Washington -- December 14, 2007

633,799 persons viewed this site in the year 2007.

    Response: Jim Cornwell wrote on February 12, 2008 in response:
Dear Benjamin S. Hall

    As to your questions:
Q) How long have you been writing this?
A) Please look at the following pages, which I think should answer this.
http://www.mazzaroth.com/CopyrightConcepts.htm
http://www.mazzaroth.com/EmailResponse.htm
http://www.mazzaroth.com/Introduction/TOCForeword.htm

Q) Is it only available as a CD?
A) Only as seen on http://www.mazzaroth.com/BookOrder.htm
    This is the best medium to sell the work around the world.    I give you a username and password to access it online, which is continually updated.
    The CD-ROM gives you all files to date as per version 3.0 release.    The CD-ROM allows fast access, compared to downloading files.

Q) What are your sales like? (High volume, low volume, etc?)
A) I had 640,000 visitors to my site in 2007.    Around 1 order for every 14000 visitors as seen on this page.

Q) What is your ultimate goal with this work?
A) I hope that the above links will answer that for you.

    Feel free to ask me if you need any more assistance with the site.

Jim
------
"Jim

    You and I have a lot in common.    I am a Messianic Believer.    I too believe what the Bible says and not what the church has been trying to make it say.    For that I have been asked not to come back to several churches simply because I dared to say that the Law of Moses IS STILL valid and should be obeyed. I’ve been called a legalist, a Jew and many other labels because I refused to compromise what the WORD says.    I, like you, defied the authority of Men in obedience to YHVH.
    I have abandoned my Christian upbringing and began to study the WORD on my own.    I found that there are many others like me who have done the same and came to the same conclusion.    God has a name, a name that most Christians do not know or refuse to hear (YHVH).    He has a purpose for choosing the men that he chose.    He came to undo the condemnation of flesh and to set our spirits free.    He did NOT do away with the law, he fulfilled it, but his message about the law was this: The law is valid; the law will NOT save you.    The law exists to only show us all that we’ve got a problem that we cannot solve.    Only through the blood of Messiah Yashua are we set free of that problem.
    In the Messianic movement I have been exposed to all of the evidence coming to light here in the final days.    That trail of evidence has led me to you.
    I understand your apprehension to directly answer my questions – there have been many that have come against you.    I have the same goal as you – to rescue as many brothers and sisters that are trapped on this sinking ship as I can."

Benjamin S. Hall
-------
Ben

    Glad to hear that you relate to my writings, and are searching for answers in the Bible instead of just sitting in a church singing Hymns a couple of days a week, hoping the Lord God (YHVH) will have favor on you this week.    I am not saying that churches are bad for you.    Just that the church is in your heart, not a building, not a congregation, but people who have great faith and do as Jesus Christ would want us to do.
    Once in church a Baptist preacher sat a menorah on his pulpit.    He tried to explain what it was and some history about it.    95% of the congregation had not ever heard of one or what it was all about.    Even though it is mentioned in Exodus.    I have always tried to relate any verse in the New Testament and Revelation with a cross reference back to its Old Testament counterpart.
    I am glad to hear that you are learning it on your own.    As you saw in the links I gave you that I did not fully understand the Bible until I started reading each verse in a three-fold concept.    Each one has a literal meaning, then a metaphysical meaning, then a spiritual meaning.    Understanding all three will help you achieve that.
    I was glad that my website led you to me regarding the final days.    My entire work covers it very thoroughly.
    I was not apprehensive to answer your questions.    I get emails from persons all over the world.    Some ask academic questions, some are looking for me to witness to them, some are into the esoteric knowledge, some are kooks, but I created those links to answer those questions.    If I answered all that email I would spend 3-5 hours a day answering them.
    So keep on helping those who need guidance, as I do and may the LORD be with you.

Jim A. Cornwell
-------
"Jim

    The 3-fold method is FASCINATING!
    I get the spiritual and physical, but what do you mean by Meta-Physical?"

Ben Hall, February 13, 2008
-------
Ben

    As I said on the bottom of my EmailResponse.htm page, "The Bible is a book written in each verse with a three-fold concept.    This is of course "the literal, the metaphysical, and the spiritual."    An analogy is the "Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost."    If you only look at these verses from one point of view, and leave the other two out of your equation, then you will miss the whole point of the Scripture.    If you become too literal, and do not include the spiritual it will fail.    Like wise if we promote the metaphysical things as valid, and leave out the spiritual it will also fail.    It was when I began doing it this way that I started seeing the truth in Genesis, and the rest of the Bible.

    I also like this verse in Revelation 3:14-19:
14) And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write: These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.
15) I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.
16) So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot.    I will spew thee out of my mouth.
    You can read the rest of 17-19.
    The reason I showed you this is that in my earlier years I researched everything from a scientific point of view.    So I looked at this as if Jesus was metaphysically talking about high cosmic physics such as negative-neutral-positive universes.    As if we are the neutral and not at the negative or positive.    In actuality the reference to cold-lukewarm-hot in the literal meaning is about a spring that ran under their church.    Spiritually it means that they are lukewarm and not hot to do the Lords bidding.    Metaphysically it has a very deep concept.    Do you know the answer to that?
    So I changed my ways to understand the Bible.    Check the site below for more on metaphysical:
http://www.mazzaroth.com/Introduction/PhilosophyScienceAndReligion.htm

Jim

---------------------------------

    "Good Day Sir;

    It is a crisp, clear Sunday morning that I write from my study desk.    One can see through the long narrow leaves of a struggling tropical plant, beyond to the view from my window.    A bust of Kleo resides to the left, to inspire my memory of Egypt.
    It is this morning that I prayed that God would fuel me with more to learn.    It is certainly how I came upon your web pages, while looking into the Temple of Esneh.
    As I marvel at the complexity of ancient cultures and the recurrence of the zodiac in their art and architecture, I see that others have come before me to ponder the same curiosities.    So here I find you have likely spent many years accomplishing a tremedous task, and I ask myself how I might find your publication (likely) but wonder if I may ask a few questions of you.
    I am a teacher of the Holy Scriptures, though humbly I admit I am a novice of sorts.    I am emboldended by the truth that I am in good company, as the disciples were once the same.    I am seeking to find the mysteries of the heavenlies.    I love how wonderfully complex our God is, and yet He unveils astounding bits that mere mortals can comprehend.    One builds upon the next, upon more and greater, until I find myself overwhelmed.    So it is with encouragement that I find your works.
    To the questions: Are you currently still studying? Do you teach courses on this subject?    Where might I find out more?     How has the scientific community responded?    Who might you hold in esteem on this same subject?
    If you would reply, I would be most grateful.    Kindly, In Christ,"
Marilee, February 24, 2008
------
Marilee

    I am glad to hear you are still trying to learn.    I have been learning all my life, and still do it even now at my age of 57.
    I am glad that your quest led you to my web pages, and your specific interest in the Temple of Esneh.    I have been studying the subjects I do since 1972.    It is a growing work.    I do not teach, but my site and all its contents are the most complete as to covering the subjects you are interested in.
    As to your questions:
Please look at the following pages, which I think should answer most of your questions about what I am doing and why.
http://www.mazzaroth.com/CopyrightConcepts.htm
http://www.mazzaroth.com/EmailResponse.htm
http://www.mazzaroth.com/Introduction/TOCForeword.htm

    If you are interested in more then you can view the entire presentable website online.
    Or you can order the entire work which is downloadable online and includes a CD-ROM, which can be seen on http://www.mazzaroth.com/BookOrder.htm
    This is the best medium to sell it on around the world.    I give you a username and password to access it online, which is continually updated.    The CD-ROM gives you all files to date as per version 3.0 release.    The CD-ROM allows fast access, compared to downloading files.
I hope this answers your questions.    If you need any other assistance please feel free to email me, or call my cell phone at 1-270-933-2321.

Jim

------------------------------

"I am searching for the information you have on Sagittarius something I have noticed about ancient images I was wondering if you share this with people I am hoping that maybe in your research you can answer a question or you have found information on it Thanks for any information you can give me on day 2 or Sagittarius."
Reverend Lynn Wedewer - March 3, 2008

------------------------------

    "Jim,

    Purchased your online book and love it!
    I was seeing something when looking at Orion.    It speaks of Ur-Ana light of heaven in Hebrew the Book of Luke is called UR or light, in Greek it means Wolf.    Then only in Luke (UR) you have the story of Anna ur-anna!    Any thoughts on this?"

Anna - March 3, 2008
--------
Anna

    Go to http://www.mazzaroth.com/VolumeIII/V3M07Lupus.htm and you will see all the Wolfy information you could want.
    Go to http://www.mazzaroth.com/VolumeIII/V3M03CanisMajor.htm for the Dog Star stuff.

    Light - Hebrew 'Uwr, oor, the same as Heb. 'uwr, from Heb. 'owr, ore, a prim. root, to be luminous, light, set on fire, shine; thus flame, hence the East (as being the region of light), fire, light; thus Ur.
    Wolf - Greek lukos, loo'-kos, perhaps akin to the base of Gr. Leukos, lyco-kos', white, thus from the whitish hair, a wolf.
    Luke - Greek Loukas, loo-kas'; contraction from Lat. Lucanus; Lucas.
    I do not think there is a connection between the above three.    Even the Greek wolf and Luke have different accent points as you can see.
    The site that you said validated it is making a transliteration of Modern Hebrew and fitting to the Greek words in the New Testament.    I have never dealt in trying to give meaning to modern words by using an ancient language.    It serves no purpose for me.    As you know Hebrew was lost after the exile, and to do what he is doing is trying to determine the vowel points that one thinks would fit.

Jim
---------
"Jim,

    Thanks for responding! Yes I do have validation here is the sight it tells you that in Hebrew the book of Luke is called UR,
    But in Greek it means wolf, could this be a Dog star????
http://www.messianic.com/articles/titles.htm
    Thanks again it pleases me that you have taken time to respond!"
Sincerely Anna, March 5, 2008
--------
Dear Anna

    Glad to hear you are finding enjoyment in the online book.
    As to your question: I take it your were looking at my page on VolumeIII/V3M02OrionDecan.htm.
    Only E.W. Bullinger and Joseph Seiss are promoting the concept that Orion was Oarion, the Egyptian Oar, from the Hebrew root, which means light, as in "coming forth as light."    The ancient Akkadian for Orion was Ur-ana, the "light of heaven."    The Akkadian solar deity was called Uru-anna.
    On my page at http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterOne/MysteryEzekielAndJohnVision.htm I have found a connection in the Hebrew word for light as you can see in the below phrase.
    To see a connection with the word Lights in Genesis 1:14-19 with the following:
    Candlestick - Heb. menowrah, men-o-raw', or menorah, feminine of Heb. manowr, maw-nore', a yoke (in the original sense of Heb. niyr, neer, or nir, also neyr, nare, or ner, or the feminine nerah, nay-raw, from a primary root [Heb. niyr or Chaldean nuwr, noor, shine, fire]) properly meaning to glisten, a lamp (i.e. the burner) or light (lit. or fig.): candle, lamp, light; a chandelier, candlestick.
    As far as the Book of Luke meaning UR or light, have no reference to that.    Do you have something that would validate that meaning?

Jim
---------
"Jim

    Thank you for pointing me in the right direction, as your site has so much information; I have barely skimmed the surface.    Yes I agree about ancient words making them modern, it is like trying to understand the ancient word with the modern mind and thinking they are the same!
    You have been most helpful in my quest for understanding and will study the links below that you sent.    One thing I see about your writings is that they are most exhaustive (much study has gone into your work).    There is something that has always puzzled me, it is the fallen angels (so called) doesn’t seem to be much info out there about this subject, have any suggestions as to where I can search?    Any certain author who writes on this subject accurately???"

Thanks again, Anna March 6, 2008
---------
Anna

    I am glad I have been helpful to you.    I am off work on Wed.-Thurs. so I have time to do that.    Although if I answered every email sent to me from around the world, I would spend 4-5 hours a day answering them.
    Yes my writing is exhaustive, and is a technical reference to any subject you would like to peruse regarding the Bible and astronomy.
    As far as fallen angels: you can go to www.google.com and type in the phrase and see what comes up.    I have extensive information on the fallen angels, nephilum (nefilum), annunaki (anakim) all throughout my work.    Just take your time and read through it and I think you will find all that you ever wanted to know, and did not know who to ask.

Jim

-------------------------------

    "I received the CD.    I am interested in your work because I have always understood the connection between the stars and the earth.    As above, so below.    I’ve even gone as far as to teach myself Astronomy however I have not investigated it to the level you have.    I plan to pass this information down to future generations once I understand it in its entirety.
    It’s obvious you’ve received divine inspiration.
    Thanks."
    Chanowk Yisrael, April 22, 2008

-------------------------------

    "I am interested in developing a play or screenplay regarding the mazzaroth.
    The basic story line would be an Arabic professor’s discovery of the real meaning of God’s story as told through the stars.    In the beginning he would be an agnostic Muslim who has rejected not only Islam but all world religions.    One day a student asks him the differences between astronomy and astrology through history and did they ever coincide.
    As the professor goes through the naming of the stars one of the students who is also searching for answers has a bible he is Hebrew and is searching for the truths his grandfather taught him.    He is reading the story of Daniel and his role in Babylonia and Chaldea and how he starts the magi who eventually come to see the king of the Jews predicted on the information Daniel taught them and that was handed down of the years.
    Having a copy of your research would greatly help.    What are your thoughts?    Could this story of God’s plan as told through the stars be told through a 2 hour film? Or a three act play?
    Grace and Peace."
    Gerald Jerry Patrick Wood, Redondo Beach, CA, April 29, 2008
--------
Dear Jerry Wood

    Is this a fiction or non-fiction play?
    As to your question: I have spent 25 years or more researching astronomy and the Bible, and my work is really a technical resource about any subject that you would want to know about that subject.
    I do cover the subject of the Magi and the Star of Bethlehem in my Chapter Six in Volume II.    The most remarkable thing about it is that a gentile group of individuals had to make the Jewish people and King Herod aware that the one who would be King has come based on their knowledge of astronomy and ancient prophecies.    The prophesy was in the book of Isaiah and Micah and no one in Judea was aware of its meaning.    It is definitely a possibility that Daniel taught this to a people that kept it and waited for it to happen.    You would also be involving yourself in the Zoroastrian religion in your quest.
    I am not the one to ask about fitting things in a time period or acts.    My own work is up around 3,000 pages now.    You will have to decide that based on your research of the subject.

Jim A. Cornwell, April 30, 2008
---------

    "A story of fiction that uses nonfiction facts to communicate the good news of the messiah coming to redeemed and restore our relationship with the creator of the universe is the Goal.
    I heard Chuck Missler talk about the mazzaroth years ago and have been mulling over this a while."

--------------------------------

    "Thank you for the follow up.    I have accessed your work and skimmed through most of it looking for particulars to questions I want answered.    My questions are the basic ones.
i) Why do we exist as we do?
ii) What is the purpose of the so called messiah and how will he accomplish same?
iii) What is the true relationship of the zodiac to the ages and the type of human/environment produced in each zodiac age?
iv) How many great years have we already gone through?
v) And the list goes on.........
    Some questions are easy and intuitive, others require work and dedication, and the rest are behind the veil... I guess to be unveiled at the proper time.    It is obvious that 2012 is a turning point as the thing that we are has gone to great lengths to provide reminders with colossal structures and extensive writings.    Also 2012 is the true start of the age of aquarius as one of the four cardinal reference points (winter) will be correctly aligned.    A new age will begin and all signs point to a cataclysmic renewal of the earth with a different breed of humans created for that age through the refinement of the great year cycles.
    Regards."

Benjamin Beneby, May 31, 2008
---------
Benjamin

    I hope you find the answers to your quest in my work.    It is a very massive resource on many subjects.    Not one that I could justify an explanation in an email.    That is the reason I put it all in a readable format.
    So as to why, and what purposes, and the relationship of the mazzaroth (zodiac) to the ages, etc., etc. you will discover that after you read the entire work.
    As to 2012 being a turning point I do present a Biblical reference to it as seen in Revelation, but it is in total opposition to your statement that "2012 is the true start of the age of Aquarius."
    Enjoy the work and let me know what you find enlightening.

Jim A. Cornwell, June 4, 2008

---------------------------------

    "I do appologize for any inconvenience to you.    When I found your sight I thought you were a Christian, Please cancel the order."

Pastor Donald Domangue , June 11, 2008
----------
Dear Pastor Donald Domangue, Galilean Baptist Church, Houma, La.

    I will be glad to cancel your order.
    But I can guarantee you that you are judging the book by the cover.
    The site reaches the world, a world that does not know, or have even heard of Jesus Christ.    I have about 3/4 of a million individuals who look at the site each year.    That averages to about 1600-1700 persons a day.    I am sure that you as a pastor would like to know you were reaching or speaking to that many every day.    If I bring one of them to come to know Jesus Christ as their Savior then it is worth the time I put into it.
    It is like a fishing hook with bait to attract those who are searching for truth or other things, just as you did.    I have never met anyone who did not find something in it that did not interest them.
    Once you begin reading into it you will realize that it is a book about Christianity.
    There are subjects in my work that you yourself would not teach or sermonize to your congregation in fear of retaliation even though you could justify them biblically.
    I know because I have been kicked out of some Baptist churches for showing people in them what is in their own Bible.
    So when you say I am not a Christian you are judging me by a work that was inspired by God for me to promote to this world.    Your opinion is yours.

Jim, June 11, 2008
----------
    A week after I emailed him the above I received a check from him for his order.

---------------------------------

    "Hi Jim,

    The CD came yesterday.    I have long been interested in ancient history, astrology, and biblical stories.    When I came across your work I was blown away ... I can't even imagine how long it must have taken you to put that all together.    I am a graphic artist, and it is inspiring a LOT of ideas for art work for me as well.
    I haven't yet had a chance to look at the CD, and I'm right in the middle of a computer backup so it might be a while yet.    I just wanted you to know that I found your work to be very interesting and there is so much to study now!
Thanks,"

Denise Tyler, August 19, 2008

--------------------------------

    "Hello Jim,

    I did write to you some time back regarding what you have written and ashamed to say it does go a little over my head but frustratingly at the same time is interesting.    Because of your in depth research regarding planets, stars and it was clear that there is a lot to be said about prophecies (sorry my only example is the Magi men searching for the birth of Jesus!).    Does it mean that there is still tell tale signs amongst these constellations regarding the future?
    I've been married now for 10 years (happily I might add!) but have not persued this subject further as my husband isn't into this, not that he's anti but as a couple one tends to do other interests that we both share so I'm afraid this area has been put aside.
    However, for some reason I have been meaning to ask you to check out another site and read some of the information.    Just as you have put so much research into your work, this person has done likewise.    For some reason I feel both your works would 'somehow' gel together rather like 2 missing pieces (okay, now you are thinking you are reading an email from some crazy woman!!!).    Its just something that has been 'niggling' me to do and the fact that I've done it I can say......well I did it and if you find this site I'm talking about of no interest then so be it.
    The site is www.bric.uk.com I'm sure you will at least have a peek.
    There I've done it!
    Very strange, it felt like one of those 'to do' lists that I can now tick as done!
    Best regards Jim,"
Michele. August 18, 2008
--------
Michelle

    As to your information regarding John Denton.    BRIC (Bible Research & Investigation Co) www.bric.uk.com
    I do not find that this sites content is even remotely relative to my own work.    As I read through Chapters 1-12 it seems to be written as if it is a fairy tale made up to fit a specific belief, although the author seems to be trying to use my time frames for the 6 days of creation, except in jubilee years, something that I copyrighted in 1995.    The author makes a lot of assumption without any relevance, but tries to fit everything to the mathematics of jubilee years and is only recently created in 2007.
    To me the research is vague and uses Biblical verses to justify their assumptions about what they think occurred.
    If you would like to understand my work better check out:
http://www.mazzaroth.com/CopyrightConcepts.htm
http://www.mazzaroth.com/Introduction/TOCForeword.htm
http://www.mazzaroth.com/EmailResponse.htm
    There I did it.

Jim A. Cornwell, August 19, 2008
--------
"Hello again Jim,

    Hmmmm, no offence was meant Jim....did I trace a snippet of sarcasm in the last bit 'there I did it' me thinks?
    Nevermind, I just thought as your were more 'knowledgeable' in these things you'd find it more interesting...as with your info I found interesting but am unable to concentrate for too long, skip chapters digress etc etc etc (very bad pupil as in class many years ago!).    I have an artistic mind (no excuses just fact) and have trouble focusing on things such as this but when I'm working on my sculpture, artwork I'm in a world of my own!
    As I mentioned (I think) I have picked up snippets but as for the 6 days of creation I believe there are other religions that do follow these time scales e.g. Jehovah witnesses?
    I realize that these subjects folk can get quite passionate about and can cause quite heated debates plus disagreements and can even get worse I suppose.
    Myself I was brought up catholic, no other family members were catholic but Church of England but my mother liked the uniform and discipline it had to offer (fair enough!) so just with everything I just went along got my education that was that and as a lot of catholics would say, they didn't really understand what it was all about and too afraid to ask the nuns ha! (merely because we should know and shouldn't query anything anyway!)
    But I'm not a religious person anyway I.e. I don't really label myself with any group but wholeheartedly believe in God, creation etc., but am guilty regarding being one for the pomp and ceremony (went and filmed one of the little girls first holy communion as a gift for her...very cute as they dress up as little brides and the little boys look smart with their red sashes, I find harmless enough as long as its not taken too seriously okay a lot there do I suppose!    This was all at the local catholic church just in case you're not too familiar with this)
    Oh well, so you found nothing whatsoever having any connection in the slightest with your work....I'd admire you for at least looking and reading through chapters 1-12!    Not sure what you meant by the part you copyrighted in 1995 was it the 6 days of creation or the jubilee part?    As I said, I thought the J.W's followed something relating to this?    (see I'm a source of 'a bit of info' here and 'a bit' there) I suppose very frustrating to others but never meaning to offend.
    You mentioned the author uses biblical verses to justify their assumptions...don't take this wrong Jim I am not a 'heated debater!!!!' but aren't these biblical verses for that very reason?    But hey ho what do I know.
    Thank you for your time and replying, I hope I haven't offended or got you riled in any way and I will look at your website and try and endeavor to PAY ATTENTION!
    Thank you again for your time,
    Just out of curiosity did you write and tell the author of your opinions it might help him after all?"

Michele
-------
Michelle

    There was no offense taken.
    At the bottom of the last file I gave you to read I make the following comment, which I consider the most important thing that one needs to understand when trying to relate their concepts to the Biblical text.    Whether it be Jehovah Witnesses, New Age frou frou, Christians trying to give their interpretations or anyone else.
    As in the case of your site with the Jubilees I see a mistake in their concept in that it is "totally mathematically based on their solutions to the Bible's complexity, and believe they can present it as a science factor, computer image or formula concept.    I originally started out that way, but soon realized it’s not quite that simple.    The Bible is a book written in each verse with a three-fold concept.    This is of course "the literal, the metaphysical, and the spiritual."    An analogy is the "Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost."    If you only look at these verses from one point of view, and leave the other two out of your equation, then you will miss the whole point of the Scripture.    If you become too literal, and do not include the spiritual it will fail.    Like wise if we promote the metaphysical things as valid, and leave out the spiritual it will also fail.    It was when I began doing it this way that I started seeing the truth in Genesis, and the rest of the Bible.    I have learned over the years, to have faith and trust in God.    He has always provided me with the right solutions, when I needed them, not when I wanted them, but it is because I follow his words with the three-fold concept that I have even grasped it."
    I have no reason to contact the author.    This is not about what I believe or you believe.    This is about what the Bible actually states.    I dare you or any other individuals to delve into the subjects on my website that they consider heresy and prove to me that they are wrong.    I have spent many years preparing the issues that one might detest, and I am not afraid to take another look at it myself.    Feel free to tear it a part.    I tried to tear it apart myself, because I could not believe at first that it could be that simple.    As to the bric site, it provides no archeological evidence or any reference to historical fact to justify its concepts or charts, other than fitting it into a mathematical time frame.    It could be challenged and torn to piece easily because they are locked into one viewpoint which is changing depending on what verse in the Bible that is promoted.

Jim - August 20, 2008

--------------------------------

    "Dear Mr. Cornwell,

    Today I first came across your website, http://www.mazzaroth.com.    I have long been fascinated with astrological clues in the Bible, particulary in Revelation (in whose first chapter I’ve suspected the Son of Man to be Orion and the seven churches the Pleiades).    I recall long ago reading a book, Oedipus Judaicus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus_Judaicus), on this subject.
    I’d really like to discuss with you the “grand meaning” of the Bible.    I’ve almost given up on Christianity, because I see that its primitiveness has little meaning for today.    Years ago I embraced the (full-) præterist eschatology, i.e., that the New Testament writers were serious in claiming to be in the last days, or in the 'terminal generation'.    So the ages have run out, and we are, if anywhere, in the ages of ages.    Perhaps your ideas can help me to find the eternal kernel of prophecy.
    So please e-mail me back, or call me at the numbers below.    Many thanks.
    Sincerely,"

Leigh Joseph Halliwell, Chattanooga, TN, September 10, 2008
---------
Dear Leigh Joseph Halliwell

    Glad to hear from you and that you have found my website.    My telephone numbers and address can be found at the bottom of the website or on the Book Order Form.    I have not updated the initial webhosting address because I have moved several times and plus it keeps me from getting a bunch of junk mail from those who use it.    The website and the entire work of Volume I, II and III covers astronomy associated with the Bible and covers in full detail every aspect of that subject, and is in the end a book about Christianity.
    Your interest in Revelation is a mighty one, and discussing the grand meaning of the Bible is very hard to do in mass on emails, unless you take one subject at a time.    That is why I wrote it all down and presented it to the world so I would not have to do that.    As to your question of whether I can help you to find the eternal kernel of prophecy, I will sure try.    My Volume II Chapter Six covers Revelation 1-5.    Revelation 6-22 continue in Chapter Seven and is a 125 page Word Document that covers everything about those chapters.    I see where you had embraced the praeterist view.    I originally had a friend named Jake Van Dyke, a co-worker, who had spent most of his life researching the six views of mankind on what they thought the Revelation meant.    He gladly gave me permission to add his research to my work.    One of those was the praeterist view of course.    My work turned out to be a new view of the association of astronomy to the Ages of Pisces and Aquarius as written in the Bible, on top of that I added my friends six world views in comparison to mine so that anyone could get the whole picture without a slant toward one or the other.
    I hope that I can help you in some way if time permits.

Jim A. Cornwell
---------
"Jim

    Thank you, Jim.    I received the CD, and am starting to read it.    Sincerely," Leigh Halliwell September 18, 2008

----------------------------------

    "Mr. Cornwell,

Is your book available for purchase?    If so, how much is it and how may I purchase one?"

Angela, October 12, 2008
--------
Angela

    I sell my work on CD-ROM with all files available online.    Click on this link or go to http://www.mazzaroth.com/BookOrder.htm to view my order form for more information.    Fill out the form, select your order, payment method, and submit your order, the next page will allow you to select a PayPal button to pay by credit, which allows me to get it to you faster than mailing a check or money order.
    I self publish in this medium around the world, and upon payment received I will email you with a username and password to access all online files, and ship your CD the next business day.    Volume I-II is 1257 pages, and Volume III is larger than both of them so it is a heavy book to make and ship.
    If you have any more questions feel free to email me back for assistance.

Jim

---------------------------------

"I really enjoy your website...I always run into when studying now and then, just had to say something :)

Karissa, October 31, 2008
--------
Krissa

Thank you for your compliment. I am glad to hear you found something of interest at the website. If you have any questions about anything in your studies feel free to ask.

Jim

---------------------------------

    "It's been a long time but I am finally ready to order your book.    It has obviously made some impression on me because I have not been able to get what I've read online out of my mind.    I pray it is still available.    Thank you."
Angie Denman, Jackson, MS, September 2, 2008
--------
"Dear Mr. Cornwell,

    Thank you.    I did indeed receive my order and the email.
    Thinking back, what originally interested me in your work was a book I was reading at the time, The Witness of the Stars by E. W. Bullinger.    I found it truly fascinating!    Are you familiar with it?    It demonstrates the gospel written in the stars.    Your work seems to be a continuing study of the same but with even more detail and research accompanying it.    I am a newbie to this train of thought...so it is rather captivating.
    Again, thank you."
Angie Denman - September 22, 2008
---------
Angie

    Glad to hear you received it, so enjoy.    You were right on in your comments.    I am not only championing a continuation of the subject of astronomy as it relates to the Bible, but I not only cover E.W. Bullinger, but about 8 other authors who have written on the subject as many of them did their studies in the late 1800's.    You can find most of this in my Volume III, where as in today's world we can access so much more information than many of those authors could in their time.    You will find in my work where I acknowledge errors made by them probably from lack of information or in some cases swayed by their religious bias.

Jim

---------------------------------

"Thanks, Great Work!"
Ropert Mcvalo - Hämeenlinna, Finland - September 3, 2008

---------------------------------

"I've been studying the Bible, Mythologoy, Astronomy and Astrology for years. I've a feeling that your writings/thoughts will mirror my own. Looking forward after having previewed some of the content.
Respectfully,"

Sharon Rife, Pearce, AZ - November 18, 2008

--------------------------------

    On December 1, 2008 I had an interview at 5:00 pm CST by a radio station www.truth.com, by D'Anne Burley, 450 Rogers Street 2E, Downers Grove, IL 60505, seen at www.danneburleyshow.com.
    The audio tape can be found on www.themicroeffect.com, then click on 'Radio Archives,' then select or open the 'Danne Burley Show', in the column you will see '2008-12-01-Danne Burley Show-Jim Cornwell' - 16 Kbps - 6.87 MB - Download - Listen.    If you click on it, it requires a username and password or pay by credit to access it.
    I was interviewed for one hour and was asked various questions about Biblical subjects from Giants, Lucifer, Elohim, Eden, Nefilim, Noah and their long lives, the antichrist-666 and who I thought it represented, what my book is about and how I came to do it before the interview was over.
    I added this link Radio Interview to a new page that would allow you to listen to it if interested.

--------------------------------

880,000 persons viewed this site in the year 2008.

The Alpha and the Omega - Volume I, Volume II, and Volume III CD-ROM Version 3.0 has been upgraded to version 4.0 as of May 30, 2009. It can now be ordered at Book Order Form.

Subject: Jim’s website errors
Beau
    "Decided to go online this morning to check my email while tam was getting ready for school.
    After that, I decided to check my history and make sure that it was still there.    Elizabeth was entertaining herself with a book.    The history from yesterday was missing.    That was ok.
    I went to Jim's site so that I could bookmark it, even though I will never forget the URL.    Its just easier if i dont have to type it in.
    While looking at the homepage, I was looking to see if there was any distinction to show me which links you clicked on.    There were not.    But I did notice an error right there on the homepage that is a pretty big error.    It is based on a Christian perception of events.
    Just as you said that the original number of the beasty was 616 and that those 70 snakes had changed it to 666...I looked and noticed the following error:
    In the basic instructions before leaving earth, the Genealogy of Jesus in Matthew says that there were 3 sets of 14 generations.    14 between Abraham and David, 14 between David and the captivity to Babylon, and 14 between the captivity to Babylon and Jesus.    Making a total of 42 generations.    This is what Jim has on his site and is depicted on the homepage without clicking on the link.

    The error is this: Matthew omits 4 names from the Genealogy.
    In Matthew verse 9, Matthew records that Uzziah begat Jotham.    But if you look back into the books of Kings and the books of Chronicles, you will see that Uzziah begat Ahziah, Ahziah begat Joash, and then Joash begat Amaziah.    After that Amaziah begat Jotham. - 3 names that were omitted in sequence.
    Then i verse 11, Matthew says Josiah begat Jechoniah.    But if you refer to the previous books of Kings and Chronicles once again, you will see that Josiah begat Jechoniah (Jehoiachin).    You will remember that he is the father of Jechoniah. - 1 name was omitted here.
    Many people dont realize this error in the Genealogy because they tend to just read over it or skip it with glazed eyes.    I never even noticed it until I got this KJV.    That was the only thing I read out of it so far.    I read it that night that I went to the Casey Treat church.    Oh No!    Everybody RUN AWAY!    hehehe.
    The notes on this error were actually right at the bottom of my KJV Study Bible.    Awesome!
    Now, please remember, that while we look at these lists of Genealogy throughout the bible as boring and pointless, that God is making a point and recording something.    This is the succession of people that he used to make accomplishments in his plan.    He used every single one of them.    And in Jesus' genealogy in Matthew, it is very big because women were never mentioned in genealogy in Jewish culture.    Here in Matthew, 4 harlots gained honor from God.    And, though this is Jesus' genealogy through Joseph, you will notice that it says "Joseph, the husband of Mary whom bore Jesus."    That says a lot right there because here is a fifth woman.    They are acknowledging Jesus' matriarchal genealogy through Mary, while at the same time giving the patriarchal genealogy through Joseph.    Why?    To show that Jesus was of the tribe of Judah through the line of David.    This shows that he is fulfilling prophecy and rightful heir to the throne of Jerusalem.    But wait!    Johoiah cut the cord.    Oh no!    Jesus can’t be heir through Joseph.    But he can be heir through Mary.    So here he is fulfilling prophecy and becoming heir through both lines of Joseph and Mary.    Oh yeah baby.
    Anyways...didn’t know if you were aware of this or not because I didn’t hear you mention it last night to Jim.    I just became aware of it last Wednesday. (7 days ago).
Hehe.
DaNette 1/14/09"
-----------
Beau and DaNette
    You may be right but then you may be wrong.    My reference to it can be found at
http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterSix/MatthewsGenealogy.htm and http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterSix/LineageOfLukeAndMatthew.htm
    That subject can vary depending on whether they were Levites and as you say they are not part of the lineage unless their mother was Jewish.
    I wish I had more time to look at it but Ethan has been running a 102 temp and have to deal with him.

Jim (I will look at it closer someday). 1/14/09
----------
Subject: Jim’s homepage
Beau
    "I just got done looking at Jim’s homepage and am very excited to see what he has written so far.    I am about to take a look at the Jesus Genealogy in Matthew.    Then I might as well look at the Jesus Genealogy in Luke.    Then I want to compare what I have read, with the corrections of the omissions, to what he has written under the 11th day on the homepage.
    I also noticed he has placed a link under the day 11 section to show the connection of the star of Bethlehem to the constellations.    You will remember that last month I asked you for this.    I believe that I told you that my interest lay in the relation of the star Sirius and its position in direct alignment over the earth.
    Recall that I had made the lists corresponding the 24 elders with the 24 constellations...the lists corresponding the 13 children of Jacob to the 12 constellations reflected in "our" astrological plan (Capricorn, Sagittarius, Virgo, Cancer, etc.) were completed.    Remember that the constellation of Gemini represents the twins and that the Constellation of Virgo represents Dinah (Jacobs only Daughter).    I had made the list of the 13 apostles/disciples in correspondence with the 12 other constellations.    The list, however, was incomplete...as the lines of ascension used to find the 12 other constellations were not the correct lines...and I didn’t have time to look at them as of yet.    I was still working on the lists at the point in time when I had deleted the entire site that they were posted on.    Remember that there were two sets of brothers that followed Jesus.    Simon and Andrew.    James and John.    Remember that one set of these brothers are represented by one constellation as well...and that a woman is the 13th disciple that is represented by the 12th constellation.    You know her name.    Wink wink.    Anyways...
    I’m hoping to find the answers and keys I need for my list on Jims website.    And am also hoping that I will see the geographical correspondences I have been hoping to find between the constellations and their long.lat. corresponding locations on the earth.    If I do...I will let you know what I come up with, what caused me to search in the first place, and what results.

DaNette" 1/14/09
---------
Beau and DaNette
    Sorry I had to delay my response to your quest.    I gave you the two website pages for your peruse in hope that you would find the answer.    I have been dealing with my 13 month-old son's temp for four days which was going up and down 101 to 105 degrees, we finally got a diagnose last night with strep throat and he is around 99 today.
    The site I gave you at http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterSix/MatthewsGenealogy.htm as you will see after the image of the generations of Jesus Christ has some sub information about variables in the genealogies as seen below:

Judah was only the fourth son of Jacob.
Matthew omits three generations (Kings) after Joram -- namely Ahaziah, Joash, and Amaziah (1 Chron. 3:11-12).
Even in Ezra 7:1-5, six generations of priesthood are omitted, compared to 1 Chron. 6:3-15, thus such an omission in Hebrew genealogies is not peculiar to Matthew’s religious considerations.
He names Zerah (Za’ra) as well as Perez (Pha’res) and mentions the brothers of Judah and of Jeconiah, which is unusual.
Ra’chab and Ruth are gentiles.
Abiud through Matthan are not found in the Old Testament, but taken from a public registry.
    I did not go into that much detail about it since it did not seem to have any relevance to what I write about.    You two seem to be on a quest for something specific that I have not quite grasped yet through your e-mails.
    I would like to comment on Matthew.    He was Jewish and as a historian of genealogies he had a tendency to leave out generations who did not fit the Jewish tradition beliefs.
    Then there is Luke, who was a Greek physician, and he would report all the genealogy because he saw no reason not to.    It is the same as I had found in the missing generation in Genesis 11, but can be found in Luke 3:36 Cainan, who he put in because it was listed in his resource material (See http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterThree/OTChronCreationToFlood.htm).    The question is did God leave Cainan out of the Old Testament, and let Luke put it in the New Testament so I could find it and tell the world there is an error in the Bible, just as you are claiming there is an error on my website.
    Matthew gave the names of those who were heirs to the Davidic throne, compared to Luke’s genealogy from Jesus to Adam that records that of the physical descent with his humanity.    Both make plain his virgin birth, and therefore his deity.
    As to your issue with Joram-Uzziah -- omiittal of Ahaziah, Joash, and Amaziah (1 Chron. 3:11-12).    Uzziah, was also called Azariah, a chief priest, a name of 19 other Israelites, who begat Ahaziah in 2 Kings 11:2, who begat Joash, who begat Amaziah, the ninth King.    Both Joash and Amaziah were killed early, and then Jotham in 2 Chron 26:26 who was a regent took over, and in 1 Chron 2:47 was called a man of the tribe of Judah.
    Even on my site at http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterSix/LineageOfLukeAndMatthew.htm I show Matthew 1:9 Ozias (Uzziah, Azariah, Amaziah) dating between 841-742 B.C. a very short reign.
    As far as your statement that Josiah begat Jechoniah (Jechoniah) I see no omittal here since that is who Matthew states who he begat, and as I said Jechoniah (born during the Exile).

Jim A. Cornwell 1/16/09

---------------------------

Subject: lord of hosts link
"Hey Jim:

    You had a page on Lord of hosts, the various meanings, and I can't find it. Could you send me the link?
    Thanks, Great Site.

Randall Carter Gray" 2/4/09
------------
RE: lord of hosts link?
Randall

    Best I can tell by your comment is I believe on this link http://www.mazzaroth.com/Introduction/AllTheHostOfHeaven.htm

Jim - 2/4/09

---------------------------

Subject: Dendérah, an other hypothesis
"Hello,
    Sorry, I'm french, I don't speak english, so my text will be very short.
    Dendérah, new studies
    I think you will be interested, show this adress and see illustrations.
http://www.roger-guasco-atelier.net/origines/page_39.php

Have a nice day
Nicole VIVANT" – 5/13/09
------------
Dear N. Vivant

    I had to go to Google and translate the pages from French to English in order to read them.
    I saw no author for this website.    Do you know who it is?    Some of this writing looks like the work from Rush Allen alias Siloam, with its reference to the esoteric meanings of the figures.
    I personally do not agree with all I read, specifically that I have the Age of Pisces starting in 210 B.C. in my own work.
    And I promote 37 decans, since most are ignoring the circle with the eight figures in it, and seem to leave it out of their configurations.
    Which is why I see some of the indicators, as your author did, representing specific starting points.    But in my studies the cycle begins at Capricornus which is the first sign after the Circle of Eight, and the other 36 decans are facing that direction in the cycle which goes around and ends at Aquarius.
    I am glad you made me aware of the site, since I am always interested in new points of view, but I did not find too much that I was not already aware of.
Jim A. Cornwell 5/15/09
-------------
Subject: Re: Dendérah, an other hypothesis
"Jim

    The author is me, Nicole VIVANT, but my work is inspired by the texts of Roger GUASCO.

N. Vivant" – 5/15/09
--------------
Subject: RE: Dendérah, an other hypothesis
Nicole

    Then you should put your name on the WebPages and copyright it as highlights from Mr. Guasco.    I have never heard of him before.
    Your synthesis of his work was well presented as to readable and I read through it thoroughly.    The areas I had trouble with was his trying to use Gematria or numbers to his thesis, including the Kabbalah, which I think has no place in the scheme of the Denderah Zodiac.    Yes the symbolism of each figure has specific meanings as to who they are and what they represent in the heavenly or earthly plane.
    I am assuming you have seen my site at http://www.mazzaroth.com/V3DemoIndex.htm which shows you how I connected the figures between Denderah, the Grand Temple, and Esneh.
    If you can present me with a connection to how those relate to each other expanded upon what I have already determined then you have my attention.    You would have to have full access to Volume III to see the whole picture of what I propose.

Jim – 5/15/09

---------------------------

Subject: RE: Genesis Jim's response:?
Dear Robin Ward

    Can anyone say they are a Hebrew scholar?
    I am attaching a file which is a purchase only 1.3 MB file named Gen1-5.doc, which is a transliteration from the King James Version back to the Hebrew using Strong’s Concordance.    Maybe it will help you answer some of your questions.
    As to your quest “I have some questions about your statement that; 'on day three, the earth was returning to normal after a period of glaciation'...    Please show me the Hebrew words that say there was a period of glaciation ---AT ALL? or that there was ice BEFORE NOAH."
    You were looking at my site at http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterOne/GenesisDayThreeScorpius.htm.
    On the "third day" Gen. 1:9-13, the earth is returning to normal conditions after a glaciation.    It is also important to note that some form of radiant light would have to be penetrating the atmosphere in order for plant life to resume its chlorophyllous functions and recharge the air with oxygen.    Fruit was abundant from the trees which was produced by the earth.
    As you will see in the Gen1-5 doc: Gen. 1:2 And the earth [(Final Tzaddi Resh Aleph He Vau) Heb. erets, earth, Gr. ge] was [(He Tau Yod He)] without form [(Vau He Tau)], and void [(Vau He Beth Vau)]; and darkness [(Final Caph Shin He Vau) Heb. hoshekh, the dark, Gr. skotos, darkness, here denotes the absence of light] {was} upon the face of [(Yod Nun Pe Lamed Tzaddi) face - Heb. panim, face] the deep [(Final Mem (Vau vowel) He Tau) Heb. tehom, “chaos” here and also in Gen. 7:11.    Linguistic evidence for the word “tehom” is aid to be a counterpart of the word Ti’amat, the name of a pagan goddess, whose sexual union with Apsu in Enuma Elish depicts the Babylonian account of Creation.    However there is strong evidence against such a parallel.    First the word Ti’amat does not contain the gutteral “h,” which is present in the Hebrew word.    One would expect the word to be spelled with an aleph in Hebrew, not a he.    Second, the Ugaritic material possesses the word thm, which is evidently the same word that appears in Hebrew as tehom.].
    You said “I read that THERE WAS NO RAIN ON THE EARTH' TIL NOAH.    So where, and how did glaciers form???    Tell me where you read that."
    As you see above the earth already existing was without form and void and in tehom, which could be none other than a world in chaos or more likely a glaciations of the Earth.
    You said, "Please take the time to read Isaiah 45 to 49.    ELOAhim is talking to Isaiah and tells him how he created the universe chapter 48:3 God says He made them - by 'breathing them into existance' -- and they appeared SUDDENLY - some versions say INSTANTLY ---no mention of PRE-existant material--nothing----The FIRST thing GOD made was THIS EARTH the rest came later.
    From the time God formed the universe til to-day ,THERE IS NO MENTION in Scripture of any glaciation -----PERIOD!!!"

Jim – 7/2/09
-------------
Robin’s question: "Seem to be an educated man, so I ask you to read Romans 1:21-26 and comment please."
Cheers Rob.
-------------
Jim’s response: I do not think I have done nothing to deny God of his omnipotence, but have shown a theory of what may have occurred and promote his glory and all of his hosts.
    As to your second quest.
-------------
Robin’s question: "I find your web site on Bible history to be extremely interesting.
    Please do me the kindness of answering one question.
    You say the LXX was commissioned by Ptolemy for the library at Alexandria around 250BC.    And that a Jewish rabbi sent 72 Jewish scholars to 'work on the translation'.
    This raises several problems.
    Firstly, NO Levite Jew would allow ---OR---consent to having Jewish scripture 'translated' into the language of 'dogs'---for 'dogs'.    either by any other than another Levite or other Jewish tribe----if it was allowed at all?"
-------------
Jim’s response: You are referring to the following sites as to what I said http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterThree/AncientWriting.htm.
    The Bible was originally written in Hebrew.    The Dead Sea Scrolls found in A.D. 1947 comprised of four scrolls, one of the first documents was a copy of the Book of Isaiah in Hebrew, and two chapters of the book of Habakkuk in Hebrew.    The Deuteronomy fragments were written in archaic script.    Every OT book except Esther was represented among them.    They are valuable as critic to the above three texts that have come down to us through time.
    The most trustworthy, is the Mb>Masoretic Hebrew text of the eighth and ninth century A.D.    Second is the Greek Septuagint and third is the .
    It may be that the Masoretic text was derived from a Babylonian revision, the Septuagint from Egyptian Hebrew, and the Samaritan from a Palestinian text; but it seems obvious that all were used in Judea.
    The Septuagint was popular in Jesus’ time, it is a translation of Hebrew into Greek by Jewish scholars in Alexandria Egypt.    The Pentateuch was translated about 250 B.C. and the entire OT about a hundred years later.    Septuagint is a Latin word for .    Later the Hexpla was a translation by Origen in Caesarea in A.D. 240 which was in harmony with other translations by Aquila (a literal word for word used by Jews), Thedotion (a revision of the Septuagint); and Symmachus (a good, smooth Greek paraphrased version).
http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterThree/HistoryOfTheBible.htm

The Septuagint (Greek Translation).
    The first and most important of a number of translations of the Hebrew OT into Greek, the LXX, is also of much value in interpretative study of biblical Hebrew.
    The conquest of Alexander the Great in the fourth century BC made Greek the most widely spoken language in the Mediterranean area.    It seemed a natural step to translate the Scriptures into Greek for the benefit of non-Hebrew-speaking Jews.    The story of the origin of the Septuagint is told in the Letter of Aristeas, a psuedepigraphical book written in the second half of the second century B.C.    It states that at the request of King Ptolemy II of Egypt (also called Philadelphus the king of Egypt) in (285-246 B.C.), the high priest Eleazer of Jerusalem sent seventy-two men, six from each tribe, to Egypt with a scroll of the Jewish Law, to be translated for his famous library in Alexandria.    In seventy-two days they translated one section each from this scroll.    So this version was the oldest Greek translation of the Old Testament (Pentateuch only) made and was called the Septuagint, the translation of the seventy, abbreviated LXX, completed about 250 B.C.    The rest of the OT was done at a later date, possibly 180.
    Others claim seventy-two Jewish scholars living in Alexandria's Jewish community were appointed to translate the great law of the Jews for his library.    Scholars do not agree on the origins of the name Septuagint, which stems from the Latin meaning "seventy."    Some believe the translation was named after the number of scholars appointed, while others believe it was named for the seventy elders of Israel mentioned in Exodus as companions to Moses.
    Another tradition states that it was undertaken by a group of Essene scholars, who were members of a mystic and ascetic Jewish sect that existed in ancient Palestine from the second century B.C. to the second century A.D.    The Essene initiates however, were reluctant to reveal the secret doctrine of the Hebrew faith to non initiates, and therefore disguised, with the use of similes and symbolic imagery, the mysteries given by Moses.    Stories such as Adam and Eve, the serpent, and of Adam's rib, which were introduced in the Greek version of Genesis, have no corresponding passages in the Hebrew original.
    The translation was gradually supplemented with translations of the remainder of the Hebrew scriptures as well as some other works that are now in the Apocrypha.    The translation posed problems later on because it was based on an earlier and different Hebrew text from the standard or Masoretic text of the rabbis, which was not finalized until the second century A.D.
    The seventy rabbis who formed the Supreme Council of the Priesthood in Jerusalem, known as the Sanhedrin, were the highest judicial and ecclesiastical council of the ancient Jewish nation.    Unaware of the abstruse quality of the Hebrew text, they accepted this misleading translation as accurate and stamped their approval on it.
    Remember that they were represented by the 23 members from the political Sadducees and also the 70 members of the religious Pharisees.
    Besides the twenty-four books contained in the Hebrew Bible, seventeen other books or portions of books were included.    Fourteen of these seventeen, plus II Esdras, now comprise the Apocrypha.    Roman Catholics accept twelve of these books or portions as of equal importance with the books of the Hebrew Bible.
    In the LXX, 1 and 2 Samuel, differ greatly from the Masoretic Text (Hebrew Bible).    Recent finds at Qumran ("The Dead Sea Scrolls") include a Hebrew MS of Samuel whose text seems very close to the LXX translation.    The LXX Daniel was set aside in favor of a later translation made by Theodotion.    The LXX Jeremiah is 1/7th and the LXX Job is 1/4th shorter than the Masoretic Text.    The LXX, is not one book, but a collection of translations of the OT produced by Jews of the Dispersion.
    The LXX had great authority among the non-Palestinian Jews, because of it being the first substantial work ever translated into another language.
    The early Christian church, of the Greek-speaking world took over the LXX as their Bible.    Their use of it, to prove to the Jews that Jesus was the Messiah, caused a change in the Jew’s attitude toward it.    After A.D. 100 the Jews completely gave up the LXX, and it became a Christian book, whose oldest copies are from the fourth and fifth centuries A.D. – Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, and Alexandrinus.

Jim
-------------
Robin’s response: "The library has been TOTALLY BURNED ( by Caesar) among others--and the compendium---many times.    Whose writings do you rely on for your statement of the above?"
-------------
Jim’s response: Actually the Encyclopedia Brittanica.
-------------
Robin’s response: "Aristeas is recorded in history, AS A COURT JESTER in Ptolemies court.    He 'made himself disappear' -- BUT he was discovered in CARTHEGE three years later.
    References in history books by Josephus, and others, refer to an ARISTeUS (different spelling).
    Modern printings of the LXX have a disclaimer that LXX CAN NOT BE TRACED PRIOR TO ORIGEN a Roman Catholic HERATICK AND LIAR.Origen CLAIMS to have 'SEEN THE ORIGINAL --AND MEMORIZED IT' --give me a break; The koran is only half as long, and it takes many years to memorize it, in all its different versions.
    Origen 'buried' his LXX forgery in something called the Hexapola.
    I don't say this is not scholarly --BUT the lie IS horrendous when the authenticity relies on liars and jokers.
regards
Robin Ward"
--------------
Jim’s response: Robin you are entitled to your opinion of what is right and or wrong.    I personally created the information you have read on my site for a reference on the History of the Bible, so that people who are interested in that can have some reference to the information.
--------------
Subject: RE: Genesis.
? Robin

    Why did you not read the Genesis 1:2 as I presented it to you, instead of ignoring it?    It tells you what you want to know.    I put it here again for you to read.
    As you will see in the Gen1-5 doc: Gen. 1:2 And the earth [(Final Tzaddi Resh Aleph He Vau) Heb. erets, earth, Gr. ge] was [(He Tau Yod He)] without form [(Vau He Tau)], and void [(Vau He Beth Vau)]; and darkness [(Final Caph Shin He Vau) Heb. hoshekh, the dark, Gr. skotos, darkness, here denotes the absence of light] {was} upon the face of [(Yod Nun Pe Lamed Tzaddi) face - Heb. panim, face] the deep [(Final Mem (Vau vowel) He Tau) Heb. tehom, “chaos” here and also in Gen. 7:11.    Linguistic evidence for the word “tehom” is aid to be a counterpart of the word Ti’amat, the name of a pagan goddess, whose sexual union with Apsu in Enuma Elish depicts the Babylonian account of Creation.    However there is strong evidence against such a parallel.    First the word Ti’amat does not contain the gutteral “h,” which is present in the Hebrew word.    One would expect the word to be spelled with an aleph in Hebrew, not a he.    Second, the Ugaritic material possesses the word thm, which is evidently the same word that appears in Hebrew as tehom.].

Jim – 7/4/09
-------------
Robin’s response: "You said 'I read that THERE WAS NO RAIN ON THE EARTH' TIL NOAH.    So where, and how did glaciers form???    Tell me where you read that."
-------------
Jim’s response: As you see above the earth already existing was without form and void and in tehom, which could be none other than a world in chaos or more likely a glaciations of the Earth.
-------------
Subject: Re: Genesis
"Hi Jim
    Gen 2:5 tells about the rain.
    Gen 2:6 tells how the earth was watered before the flood.
    Genesis 1:6 strongly indicates a canopy of water (ice) around the earth that provided the abundance of WATER that covered the whole earth to a depth of 15 cubits above the lands highest point ---for 150 days after the rain stopped.
    Now please show me from scripture ----where is ANY glaciation mentioned?
Thanks
Rob" – 7/3/09
-------------
Subject: Re: Genesis
"Hi again
    Once again I must question sources.
    The dead sea scrolls contain many (most) texts that could ONLY have survived from LACK of use----NOT because they were primary source material.    In other words, cave four, where most of your material comes from were used as reference material.
    I have many books in my library that are NOT reliable as scripture; for instance the book of mormon, New world translation, Dekes annotated bible NIV translations, (47 different, The 'message' from hell, by Peterson, to name just a few.    This does NOT make them correct, and I would not want my great grandkids to think of them as 'APPROVED' by me as 'ACCURATE' after I die.
    In other words, just because something is 'OLD' doesn't make it correct OR accurate.
    This is the problem with the LXX which can NOT be proved to have existed BEFORE ORIGEN.    The Roman church has fed us lies since the fourth century, and continue to this day.    THEY CAN NEITHER BE TRUSTED OR RELIED ON FOR ACCURACY.    This LXX hoax is just another of their DECEPTIONS.
    You say, now, that the LXX was a 'collection' of books from the diaspora.    This would indicate it was written over a 400 yr period --NOT done in six months in Alexandria---well, which was it --diaspora, or Ptolemy’s directive?    I believe neither because NOT ONE OF THE DISCIPLES even mention such a MOMENTOUS WORK --- not in their main writings --OR--margin notes.
    In fact Paul mentions there were FALSE WRITINGS BEING CIRCULATED (II Thes 2-2) during his ministry--Possibly 'some translation' or other qualifies as your LXX Paul exorts Christians TO AVOID THEM as not coming from any of the apostles.
    I do not deal in speculation OR OPINIONS when it comes to the truth about scripture--either statements can be PROVED or they must be relegated to the 'reference' category --OR the scrap heap.

Cheers Rob." 7/3/09
---------------
Subject: RE: Genesis
? Robin

    Please go ahead and relegate, reference and scrap all you want.    I have no reason to change what I wrote.    The history of conspiracy is not what I am writing about.    Although I see Paul as never one of the original Apostles.    He or the Lord God put him in that role and his progeny took over to develop what is the Roman Catholics of today.
    As to my writings you are picking phrases from my work out of context to fuel your arguments.    If you read the whole thing through you will see that I gave you three opinions on what various scholars believe.    So this is not my opinion, I leave this for the reader to decide or choose what to believe.    Obviously you have one, and making others choose yours is for you to do.
    Also I do not push the Dead Sea Scrolls in my work.    They are useless to me as to what I write about.    I actually believe they surfaced in our time not for me, but so that the Jewish people or Israelites may come to terms with validity that the New Testament and Jesus Christ may actually be the Messiah they missed.

Jim – 7/4/09
---------------
Subject: Three-Fold Concept?
Robin

    I do not want to banter with you over semantics of the Bible mainly because it can never do justice in the concept of emails.    I am bombarded sometimes with emails from individuals who believe that they have all the answers to the history of mankind.    I have even had someone to tell me that 25 years worth of research is all down the drain, because they believe my initial core material is incorrect.    My site is not the entire book.    The research was based on the Biblical Genesis itself, and not on the beliefs of the ancient Egyptians.    There are many theories as to where Genesis begins, whether millions of years ago, during the Age of Capricornus, or some other era.    My initial work is not about whether I have the right THEORY, but whether people are taking a second look at the word of God, and renewing their faith that he was the original astronomer who named the stars and gave them the patterns as it states in Psalm 147:4 "He telleth the number of the stars, he calleth them all by their names."
    Yes the Bible is a very complex subject.    One source stated to me that "Yours is the best site (or any info) that is much related to the patterns and systems that I have and am producing by an independent means of Bible study; I have seen many other patterns of time related to the Precession, but yours is by far the most interesting relative analysis."    Another sources stated, "The time-table of the Grand Year you present versus the Bible is the most well construed I have seen so far (I have reviewed about 3 other theories)."    Then on the other side I get probably 2-3 individuals a year email me that are totally mathematically based on their solutions to the Bible's complexity, and believe they can present it as a science factor, computer image or formula concept.    I originally started out that way, but soon realized it’s not quite that simple.
    As an example I also like this verse in Revelation 3:14-19:
14) And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write: These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.
15) I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.
16) So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot. I will spew thee out of my mouth.
    You can read the rest of 17-19.
    The reason I showed you this is that in my earlier years I researched everything from a scientific point of view.    So I looked at this as if Jesus was metaphysically talking about high cosmic physics such as negative-neutral-positive universes.    As if we are the neutral and not at the negative or positive.    In actuality the reference to cold-lukewarm-hot in the literal meaning is about a spring that ran under their church.    Spiritually it means that they are lukewarm and not hot to do the Lords bidding.    Metaphysically it has a very deep concept.    Do you know the answer to that?
    So I changed my ways to understand the Bible.    Check the site below for more on metaphysical:
http://www.mazzaroth.com/Introduction/PhilosophyScienceAndReligion.htm
    The Bible is a book written in each verse with a three-fold concept.    This is of course "the literal, the metaphysical, and the spiritual."    An analogy is the "Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost."    If you only look at these verses from one point of view, and leave the other two out of your equation, then you will miss the whole point of the Scripture.    If you become too literal, and do not include the spiritual it will fail.    Likewise if we promote the metaphysical things as valid, and leave out the spiritual it will also fail.    It was when I began doing it this way that I started seeing the truth in Genesis, and the rest of the Bible.    I have learned over the years, to have faith and trust in God.    He has always provided me with the right solutions, when I needed them, not when I wanted them, but it is because I follow his words with the three-fold concept that I have even grasped it.
    So in general you should not take verses from the Bible and try to justify what you believe them to mean, until you have understood them from the three-fold concept and even then it should be considered to the whole chapter that it is located in.
    I know you are sincere and convicted to find answers to your questions and I would like to answer them for you, but you have a tendency to jump from subject to subject without concluding the results of the first question.    I get a lot of emails from people asking me a lot of very difficult questions.    If I answered them all I would spend 4-5 hours a day responding to them.    I just do not have that kind of time.
    That is one reason I wrote my book for many to peruse in hope they could find a few answers to some of their questions, and I am sure that if you did so you might just find something that would interest you to.
    Just remember that my original concept is about the connections between astronomy and the Bible from Genesis to Revelation.

Jim - 7/08/09
--------------
"Hi Jim
    You asked if I had an explanation for Rev.3.
    Hot, cold, lukewarm, refers to temperature; and in this case---attitudes.    The lukewarm church was complacent because it was wealthy, and supposedly, was in need of nothing more.    If one starts to look at the metaphysical aspect of this scenario, the simple meaning is lost.    Christ told us in Mark 16 to go into the entire world and preach the Gospel---.    Obviously the lukewarm church had become so complacent, they stopped doing this.
    Any reference to Christ being FIRST CREATED is a fallacy.    The Greek here ONLY means PRE-EMINENCE in rank or RULER Christ is the creator and the LIVING WORD.    He is also called ALPHA AND OMEGA Rev 1:8 Isaiah 48:12 any metaphysic connotations here are once again, purely speculative.    Hot, cold, lukewarm, simply refers to people’s attitudes, and mindsets.    Unfortunate this happens, but I’ve seen it happen many times.

Cheers Rob" – 7/14/09
--------------
RE: Genesis
? Thanks for the input.

Jim – 7/14/09

----------------------------

Subject: Hi Jim
"Jim,

    I've just been looking at your webpage.    On the mysterious symbol between the end and beginning, the omega and alpha; i have a suggestion to its meaning.
    It is the intervening 13th age, brief but inclusive, of aesculapius.    the physician
    "physician heal thyself", and all that...
    upon the eight figures, be they 8 crouched men of lowly report, or be they eight 7's of L's....
    they are the eight figures assoiciated with Krishna, Arjuna, Chariot and five horses; or perspectively, these eight being made whole as the 9th of completionary Human Being of the Universal Mansion.
    i here turn attention to the antakharana, having 6 faces, they being a whole as the 7th consciously awake to the 6 faces. however, the 7th knows not what he does, ergo he calls upon the 8th - Christ/Krishna whom teaches the 7th to take the reins of mind leading to and from the five senses.
    it seems to me, that when a number of images is symbolized, that it is preparatory to the next number.    1 suggests 2, 2 leads to 3..etc. that this 8 figured symbol is suggestive of 9.
    turning to I Ching for a bit, we may identify that 63, or 9(7), is the number of completion. one would imagine that 64 would be, however, one may see that 64 has gone to far, so much so, that repeating the entirety of the course is at hand.    this unless the 64 turns, looking back at the river, and realizes that the true meaning behind the purpose of the course had not been seen in it's completeness, the 63 - the marrying maiden.
    this 9th is the resurrected one, having laid down the life's whole import (8), died on it's cross, and risen to pick it up in the spirit of truth.
    there is no tenth, merely return to zero (0).    alpha and omega
    pretty much this ninth figure of man is the taoist, whom upon hearing of all this much ado about nothing, laughs heartily.
    of course the underlying mechanism of all this, is just that, the universe is a machine of sorts, a living machine. Understanding the times, one sees the polarity of earth shifting its magnetism from the north star to that of the dragon, whose eye awakens and grows brighter.    historically this has delivered a sort of compression of outlying insanity.
    but never fear, what is not us, the insanity, the ills within, must come out and into the open field of expression, thereby rendered obsolete as a human variable by trait.    god did not create man to be so.
    in this field is left that which is not right, and from this field the right goes out.
    just as you have eluded to in your quotes.
    what is left goes around again, ever it is it sifted in the grist mill that lives all around us.    it is a seasonal design all in all.    yet, it is said, that man is more than bread.
    i suggest, that even as the water was turned into wine upon the wedding day, that this wine having aged for a time is now being blended with brandy, to make the sherry- a good table wine. even further to suggest, that in time what has been turned to wine is to be turned back into water...delivering the very sobriety from the intoxicating time that the translations of the word has come through.
    i merely suggest though, really not knowing a darn thing beyond intuitive speculations.
    your webpage has been helpful to me toward relating what i feel to know within balancing with seems to be without.    thank you for that.

tim" - 8/19/09
-------------
Dear Tim

    I am glad to hear that one of my Concepts, have enlightened you to understanding your own.    I have not dwelled that much in the Hindu philosophies or the I Ching, since they are not a part of my forte of experience.
    I would not be able to connect either to the "circle of eight" symbol on the Zodiac of Denderah, since it has an Egyptian-Greek origin.    Whether the symbol is a beginning, or an end, or a continuation into a new cycle is still undetermined.    If you find out, then let me know.

Jim A. Cornwell – 8/19/09

----------------------------

Subject: Using quotes from other sources
? Bharat Jhunjhunwala

    I do not appreciate you entering quotes on your web page from my website www.mazzaroth.com without referencing what page you got the quote from.
    The way you presented it on your page appears to be someone who is trying to slant their view.
    If I actually wrote that quote then someone should be able to go to that reference and verify it.

Jim A. Cornwell – 9/16/09
--------------
Subject: Re: Using quotes from other sources
"Jim

    I am indeed sorry if there has been an affront. I totally agree that references must be there.    I only seek a little time to do this.
    I am trying to construct the page. All references have not been added yet.    I have not had the time to do this.
    Anyways, I will try to mention the reference to your quote as soon as possible.
    Thank you very much for your email.

Bharat" – 9/17/09
--------------
Subject RE: Using quotes from other sources.?
Bharat Jhunjhunwala

    I have been researching the subject of Abram, the Hebrew and his transformation to Abraham for at least 20 years.    I have covered every avenue of information that is available on the life of Abram and Abraham, except what is being held back by countries in the Middle East that will not let the archaeologist find and release because of their bias from Islamic denial for any Biblical release of information.
    During that time I have never come across even an inkling that Abram and his tribe was connected to the Indus Valley in any form.
    Although I have found much on the connection of early Egyptian Dynasties connected to the Indus Valley mainly through the entity Sargon.    I have attached two files BK1P1C4a.doc and Bk1p1c4b.doc, regarding that for your peruse since you would have to purchase my work to read them.    Also attached is a file Abrams Sumerian Influence To Peruse.doc.
    As to your site http://ramabraham.com/genealogy.php and story of Rama running parallel to the Biblical Abram, in the Ganges basin, Central India and Sri Lanka, and that Rama-Abraham is the same person who lived in the Indus Valley.
    If you have read any of my website you may know that I promote that Abramu was a tribe of people who existed as far back as 4,500 B.C. and that the term Abram and Sarai, represents the leader and princess of the tribe.    In such there were many of them in that span of time.    And this would make sense just by reading Genesis 11-20 to see the multiple personalities, skills and attitudes the Abram and Sarai emanate in the words.    It was in Genesis 17 that God changed the last Abram and Sarai’s name to Abraham and Sarah to reflect their future, which I date as occurring around 2,300-2,000 B.C.
    I noticed in your page that you too have not acknowledged that his original name was Abram and should be stated as that if comparing him to another source.    In this email below I corrected your statements where Abraham was used incorrectly, and put Abram in its place.    I also am not in disagreement that Abram’s sojourns to Predynastic Egypt may have influenced them, and He could very well have been the King Scorpion (i.e. Sargon).

Rama-Abraham equivalence
    I have never read any of the Hindu works mainly because I just cannot make sense of them.    Most of them read like a fairy tale and I just do not connect with any relevance.    The Indian tradition from different versions of the Ramayana, the Valmiki and Jaina tradition in Vimalsuri’s Paumcariyam are unfamiliar for me.
    Whether the Biblical story of Abram and that of Rama have any similarities from your sources is still suspect without valid research and as you stated you are only trying to establish such a possibility.

Jim A. Cornwell – 9/18/09

-------------------------------

1,273,863 persons viewed this site in the year 2009.

Last updated May 4, 2006, June 30, 2006, December 31, 2006, January 10. 2008, December 31, 2008, May 30, 2009 and January 30, 2010.